A nice addition to APEX release 18.1 is the Application Settings feature. This allows the developer to define one or more configuration values that are relevant to a particular application. In a recent project this feature came in useful.
I had built a simple questionnaire/calculator application for a client and they wanted a small “FAQ” box on the left-hand side of the page:
I could have built this as an ordinary HTML region, but the Admin users needed to be able to modify the content later, so the content needed to be stored somewhere. I didn’t feel the users’ requirement was mature enough to design another table to store the boilerplate (not yet, at least), so I thought I’d give the Application Settings feature a go.
An Application Setting is a single value that can be set in Component Settings, and retrieved and modified at runtime via the supplied PL/SQL API (APEX_APP_SETTINGS). The feature is most useful for “configuration”-type data relevant to the application’s user interface. In the past I would have created a special table to store this sort of thing – and in some cases I think I still would – but in some cases using Application Settings may result in a simpler design for your applications.
I went to Shared Components, Application Settings and created a new Setting called “FAQ_BOILERPLATE“. Each Application Setting can have the following attributes configured:
Name – although this can be almost anything, I suggest using a naming standard similar to how you name tables and columns, to reduce ambiguity if you need to refer to the setting in your PL/SQL.
Value – at first, you would set this to the initial value; if it is changed, it is updated here. Note that the setting can only have one value at any time, and the value is global for all sessions. The value is limited to 4,000 bytes.
Value Required – if needed you can make the setting mandatory. In my case, I left this set to “No”.
Valid Values – if needed you can specify a comma-delimited list of valid values that APEX will validate against. In my case, I left this blank.
On Upgrade Keep Value – if you deploy the application from Dev to Prod, set this to Yes so that if a user has changed the setting your deployment won’t clobber their changes. On the other hand, set this to No if you want the value reset to the default when the application is deployed. In my case, I set this to Yes.
Build Option – if needed you can associate the setting with a particular build option. If the build option is disabled, an exception will be raised at runtime if the application setting is accessed.
On the page where I wanted to show the content, I added the following:
A Static Content region titled “FAQ”.
A hidden item in the region named “P10_FAQ_BOILERPLATE“.
A Before Header PL/SQL process.
The Text content for the static content region is:
The more APEX-savvy of you may have noticed that this design means that if an Admin user clears out the setting (setting it to NULL), since it has the Server-side Condition on it, the FAQ region will disappear from the page (by design). This also includes the Edit button which would no longer be accessible. In the event this happens, I added another button labelled “Edit FAQ” to the Admin page so they can set it again later if they want.
This was a very simple feature that took less than an hour to build, and was suitable for the purpose. Later, if they find it becomes a bit unwieldy (e.g. if they add many more questions and answers, and need to standardise the layout and formatting) I might replace it with a more complex design – but for now this will do just fine.
An application I maintain needed a checklist feature added. I wanted to show a “Yes / No” switch for a list of checklist items. Initially, when the record is created, the checklist is populated with the questions along with a NULL for the response.
I generated the switches in an ordinary Classic report using code like this:
select r.name as risk_category
(p_idx => 10
,p_value => i.response
,p_on_value => 'Yes'
,p_on_label => 'Yes'
,p_off_value => 'No'
,p_off_label => 'No'
,p_item_id => 'RESPONSE_' || rownum
,p_item_label => i.risk_category_code || '-' || i.rci_fk
,p_attributes => 'data-risk="' || i.risk_category_code || '"'
||apex_item.hidden(p_idx => 11, p_value => i.rci_fk)
from supplier_risk_checklist_items i
join risk_categories r on r.code = i.risk_category_code
where i.sri_fk = :P10_ID
order by r.sort_order nulls last, i.sort_order nulls last, i.rci_fk
The problem is that all the NULL responses are indistinguishable from the “No” responses. If the user clicks “Yes” or “No”, the response is saved correctly – but the user cannot tell which ones haven’t explicitly been answered yet.
To find a solution for this issue I started by examining the HTML being generated for each question. I noticed that the input option for the “No” value was marked as “checked”, while the hidden input item had no “value” on it. These were the ones that needed fixing.
In the page’s Execute When Page Loads, I search for all instances of responseSwitch where the hidden input item does not have a value attribute; in each case, I find the associated input item that shows “No” and unset the “checked” property:
// workaround for generated switch items showing "No" when value is null
// search for the hidden input items without a value (i.e. null on the database)
var id = $(this).attr("id");
// these will have "checked" on the "No" option; remove it
This makes it clear to the user which checklist items have been answered so far, and which ones haven’t.
Note: the user is given no way to unset an answer once it has been saved; if this were a problem I would change this to use an ordinary Select list item instead of a Switch item.
Otherwise reported as “WWV_FLOW_FORM_REGION.NO_PRIMARY_KEY_ITEM” or merely “Internal error”, this bug caused me to waste hours of investigation, twice, because a simple Google search was not returning any results. This post is merely to remedy that situation.
On an APEX 19.1 page with a new Form region combined with an Interactive Grid region, when the user makes a change to a record and Submits the page, they get this error.
In the past when I’ve needed to add half a dozen or more buttons to a page, I’ve sometimes encased them in a Collapsible region so that the user can slide them out of the way instead of clogging up the screen. Recently however I’ve started (sparingly) using a Menu Popup, as per this tutorial. The issue I have with this method, however, is that the menu items are defined in a shared component (a List) which means it’s not defined on a per-page basis.
Some of the actions simply need to do a Submit on the page, which is simple enough: set the URL Target to something like:
In other cases, the action needs to do something more specific to the page, e.g. show a region:
Or the action might need to navigate to another page, passing parameters based on specific items on the page. This means the list, defined in Shared Components, now has hardcoded elements that are only useful for that one page; more to the point, they are defined outside of the page – I’d rather that everything specific to a page is defined within that page’s definition.
The approach I’m using now is to use a custom trigger. Each list item has its URL Target set to something like:
The third parameter is set to a unique code that the page can use to identify which menu option was chosen. This parameter will be passed to this.data in the custom trigger’s event handler.
On the page, I have a Dynamic Action with the following attributes:
Custom Event: menuAction
The benefit of this approach is that this trigger becomes the jumping-off point for all such menu actions for this page. In theory I could re-use the same List on multiple pages (if the items in the list are generic enough) but have different behaviour occur for each menu item specific to each page. The only challenge with this approach might be if you needed some conditions on each menu item, e.g. so they are shown or hidden in specific circumstances. If the condition for a menu item references a particular page item the List will no longer be generic and re-usable. For this reason, I usually still use a separate List for each menu for each page.
Perhaps in a future release of APEX we will gain the ability to define a List on a Page instead of in Shared Components. In the meantime, if you are interested in all the details on this method (including a solution for implementing a redirect to another page, or to open a modal page), refer to this tip.
EDIT 22/8/2019:Thanks to Robert Gerstein who noticed an issue with this solution when using Internet Explorer. A workaround for this is to not call apex.event.trigger directly in the URL on the list item, but to call a function instead (refer to comments below).
An item in the Universal Theme using the Optional – Floating template looks like this:
An item using the Required – Floating template looks like this:
In addition, if the item is required we would most probably set the Value Required attribute to Yes. What if the item is sometimes required but not always? How do we create a Conditionally Required field?
Firstly, we would make sure there is a Validation on the field that checks that the value is provided if required. This way, regardless of what the form may or may not send to the database, it is validated appropriately.
Secondly, to indicate to the user that the item is required or optional, based on the value of another item, we can use a Dynamic Action that sets the required item property (this triggers the client-side validation) and adds or removes the is-required class from the item’s container (this shows the little red “required” indicator on the page).
For example, let’s say that whether item P1_COST_CENTRE is required or not is dependent on whether a hidden item, P1_COST_CENTRE_REQUIRED, has the value 'Y'.
Create a Dynamic Action
Selection Type: Item(s)
Client-side Condition Type: Item = Value
var item = $("#P1_COST_CENTRE");
var item = $("#P1_COST_CENTRE");
The above code works for all item templates (“Optional”, “Optional – Above”, “Optional – Floating”, etc.) in the Universal Theme; I’ve tested this on APEX 18.2 and 19.1.
Note: this is custom code for the Universal Theme, so it may or may not work for other themes; and might stop working in a future revision of the theme.
To use these plugins, select them as an Action to take on a Dynamic Action:
EDIT 29/7/2019: modified to use a better method to find the container div.
In other themes, the way that a required field is rendered is different. For example, in Theme 26 (Productivity Applications) the label for a required item is rendered in bold, along with a red asterisk; if the item is optional, no red asterisk is rendered. The way to make an item conditionally mandatory in this theme is:
Set the item to use the Required template (so that the red asterisk is rendered).
var itemLabel = $("label[for='P1_COST_CENTRE']");
To make the item required again:
var itemLabel = $("label[for='P1_COST_CENTRE']");
The plugin has been updated to Oracle APEX 18.2 (as that is the version my current system is using). Unfortunately this means that people still on older versions will miss out, unless someone is willing to give me a few hours on their APEX 5.0 or 5.1 instance so I can backport the plugin.
EDIT: Release 1.0.1 includes some bugfixes and a backport for APEX 5.0, 5.1 and 18.1.
The plugin is easy to install and use. You provide a SQL Query that returns latitude, longitude, and information for the pins, and the plugin does all the work to show them on the map.
The beta releases of the plugin (0.1 to 0.10) kept adding more and more plugin attributes until it hit the APEX limit of 25 region-level attributes. This was obviously not very scaleable for future enhancements, so in Release 1.0 I ran the scythe through all the attributes and consolidated, replaced, or removed more than half of them – while preserving almost every single feature. This means v1.0 is not backwards compatible with the beta versions; although many attributes are preserved, others (including the SQL Query itself, which is rather important) would be lost in the conversion if the plugin was merely replaced. For this reason I’ve changed the Internal ID of the plugin. This is so that customers who are currently using a beta version can safely install Release 1.0 alongside it, without affecting all the pages where they are using the plugin. They can then follow the instructions to gradually upgrade each page that uses the plugin.
New features include, but are not limited to:
Geo Heatmap visualisation (this replaces the functionality previous provided in a separate plugin)
Lazy Load (data is now loaded in a separate Ajax call after the page is loaded)
The plugin attributes that have been added, changed or removed are listed here.
I am very keen to hear from everyone who is using the plugin, and how it is being used – please let me know in the comments below.
If you notice a bug or have a great idea to enhance the plugin, commenting on this post is not the best place – instead, please raise an issue on GitHub.
The floating item type has an optional “Icon” property that allows you to render an icon next to the item, which can help users quickly identify what the item is for. This is especially helpful when the form has a lot of items.
The icon attribute can be static, e.g. fa-hashtag, or it can be chosen based on the value of another item, e.g. &P1_FA_ICON..
If you want the icon to change dynamically as the user enters or modifies data, it’s a little bit more complicated. I have a list item based on a table of asset categories, and each asset category has an icon assigned to it. When the user selects an asset category from the list I want it to get the icon from the table and show it in the item straight away.
The Execute PL/SQL Code action is a simple PL/SQL block which gets the icon from the reference table for the selected category code. Make sure the “Wait for Result” is “Yes”, and make sure the Items to Submit and Items to Return are set to P260_CATEGORY_CODE and P260_CATEGORY_FA_ICON, respectively.
from asset_categories x
where x.code = :P260_CATEGORY_CODE;
On examining the source of the page, we see that the select item is immediately followed by a span which shows the icon:
It’s a little gimmicky but it’s an easy way to delight users, and it might help them to quickly identify data entry mistakes.
Refreshing any of our non-prod environments (e.g. dev, test, etc.) with a clone from production is a fairly regular process at my client. A recurring issue with this is emails: we’ve had occasion where users have received a second copy of an email immediately after the clone has completed. This was confusing because they thought the event that had triggered the email actually occurred twice.
As it turns out, the duplicate emails were caused by the fact that the emails happened to be waiting in the APEX mail queue in production at the time of the export. After the export, the APEX mail queue was processed normally in production and the users received their emails as expected; after the clone was completed, the database jobs were restarted in the cloned environment which duly processed the emails sitting in the cloned queue and the users effectively got the same emails a second time.
What’s worse, if the same export were to be used for multiple clones, the users might get the same emails again and again!
A good way to solve this sort of issue would be to isolate the non-prod environments behind a specially configured mail server with a whitelist of people who want (and expect) to get emails from the non-prod systems. We don’t have this luxury at this client, however.
Instead, we have a post_clone.sql script which is run by the DBAs immediately after creating the clone. They already stop all the jobs by setting job_queue_processes=0.
In case the mail queue happens to have any emails waiting to be sent, the post clone script now includes the following step:
*** WARNING: DO NOT RUN THIS IN PRODUCTION! ***
for r in (
(p_security_group_id => apex_application_install.get_workspace_id);
This script is run as SYS but it could also be run as SYSTEM or as APEX_nnnnnn, depending on your preference.
ADDENDUM: Overriding the From Email Address
Christian Neumüller commented that an additional technique that might be useful is to override the From (sender) email address to indicate which environment each email was sent from. To do this, run something like the following:
'apex-' || sys_context('userenv','db_name') || '@mydomain');
I’ve tested this in APEX 19.1 and it seems to work fine. Regardless of the p_from parameter that the code passes to apex_mail.send, the EMAIL_FROM_OVERRIDE email address is used instead. Note that this is currently undocumented, so this may stop working or change in a future release.
The updated Universal Theme has added new “Floating” item templates which look great, e.g.:
I had a list item which I wanted to leave optional; if the user leaves it null, I wanted it to show a “default” display value (derived at runtime). To implement this, I added a hidden item (P10_DEPTNO_DEFAULT) and on the list item set Null Display Value to &P10_DEPTNO_DEFAULT..
If the page is shown in read-only mode, however, the list item is rendered as a Display Item, and the Null Display Value attribute is ignored:
To solve this, I added a Dynamic Action which injects the default value into the HTML for display (without affecting the value of the underlying item):
Event: Page Load
Server-side Condition: <page is readonly> AND :P10_DEPTNO IS NULL
Fire on Initialization: No
This finds the span for the display-only item and injects the default display value for display:
Like most active sites our applications have a healthy pipeline of change requests and bug fixes, and we manage this pipeline by maintaining a steady pace of small releases.
Each release is built, tested and deployed within a 3-4 week timeframe. Probably once or twice a month, on a Thursday evening, one or more deployments will be run, and each deployment is fully scripted with as few steps as possible. My standard deployment script has evolved over time to handle a number of cases where failures have happened in the past; failed deployments are rare now.
One issue we encountered some time ago was when a deployment script happened to be run at the same time as a database scheduler job; the job started halfway during the deployment when some objects were in the process of being modified. This led to some temporary compilation failures that caused the job to fail. Ultimately the deployment was successful, and the next time the job ran it was able to recover; but we couldn’t be sure that another failure of this sort wouldn’t cause issues in future. So I added a step to each deployment to temporarily stop all the jobs and re-start them after the deployment completes, with a script like this:
for r in (
where schedule_type = 'CALENDAR'
and enabled = 'TRUE'
order by 1
(name => r.job_name
,force => true);
This script simply marks all the jobs as “disabled” so they don’t start during the deployment. A very similar script is run at the end of the deployment to re-enable all the scheduler jobs. This works fine, except for the odd occasion when a job just happens to start running, just before the script starts, and the job is still running concurrently with the deployment. The line force => true in the script means that my script allows those jobs to continue running.
To solve this problem, I’ve added the following:
prompt Waiting for any running jobs to finish...
whenever sqlerror exit sql.sqlcode;
max_wait_seconds constant number := 60;
start_time date := sysdate;
where state = 'RUNNING'
and rownum = 1;
when no_data_found then
job_running := null;
exit when job_running is null;
if sysdate - start_time > max_wait_seconds/24/60/60 then
'WARNING: waited for '
|| ' seconds but job is still running ('
When the DBA runs the above script, it pauses to allow any running jobs to finish. Our jobs almost always finish in less than 30 seconds, usually sooner. The loop checks for any running jobs; if there are no jobs running it exits straight away – otherwise, it waits for a few seconds then checks again. If a job is still running after a minute, the script fails (stopping the deployment) and the DBA can investigate further to see what’s going on; once the job has finished, they can re-start the deployment.